DISCLOSE, DISCLOSE, DISCLOSE. These are probably the most important three words in Bankruptcy. All too often debtors negligently, and sometimes intentionally, fail to disclose all assets and debts. Not only is this a federal crime subject to fine and imprisonment and loss of such assets, but it may also result in the non-issuance or revocation of your discharge. Disclosure also requires complete transparency with your finances. As such, “due diligence” documents are required in the Southern District of California Bankruptcy Courts. Failure to supply all documents will result in your case not being filed, continuances, and/or denial of discharge.
Filing for Bankruptcy is an extensive paperwork process, with significant document gathering and processing, in addition to research, disclosures, and sometimes multiple court and trustee hearings. Nevertheless, the more work done up properly front, the smoother and easier the process will be.
A large part of the filing process involves compiling all the due diligence documents for the trustees and disclosing all assets. I had written about such documents in the past for the Southern District of California. However, due to present economic conditions fueling the increase in bankruptcy case loads and new and often inexperienced attorneys entering the bankruptcy field, compliance issues continue to affect Trustees’ calendars.
Unfortunately, those unprepared cases affect everyone at the 341 hearing, including those that fully comply with providing complete information. Cases are delayed, continued, trailed, hearings run longer than required, and frustration sets in to everyone at the hearing room.
Fortunately, Doan Law clients are usually called first since we make sure the Trustees have all proper documents. And our clients’ play a vital role in this regard by getting us all the requested information. The documents our clients supply us saves a tremendous amount of time in the long run, notwithstanding all the time saved for trustees, attorneys, judges, and other court personnel. Just as important, documentation gathering also ensures compliance with the disclosure requirements, confirms accurate bankruptcy schedules, and streamlines the path to discharge.
So when in doubt, just fall back on the adage: disclose, disclose, disclose. “Disclosure” is to bankruptcy what “location” is to real estate. There is no such thing as too much disclosure, only too little. All too often debtors forget to disclose assets and previous asset transfers. This can cause serious problems.
Remember, all your assets create a new entity called the bankruptcy estate when your case is filed. Such assets include everything you own, from obvious items such as clothing, furniture, cars, homes, and jewelry, to the not so obvious items such as food in the pantry, toilet paper, patents, copyrights, licenses, trusts, garbage, toothpaste, etc.
Just as important as those assets are the creation of new assets that usually only take place in bankruptcy through the trustee’s avoidance powers. These new assets arise from asset transfers in the months and years prior to the filing date. Yes, the $20 birthday gift you sent 3 years ago could technically become as asset of the estate, although it would never be pursued. So please, DISCLOSE EVERYTHING!
Below is a recent email sent to Bankruptcy Attorneys throughout San Diego County from one of the Chapter 7 Panel Trustees. The email describes a case where the debtor did not comply with disclosure requirements and the consequences of the same. Simple disclosure and attorney competence could have easily prevented the outcome. Hopefully, debtors and their attorneys will take heed to this Trustee’s email, comply with the guidelines, improve the efficiency of bankruptcy case management, and avoid such adverse consequences:
Yesterday I had the unpleasant task of seeking a revocation of discharge on debtors for their failure to disclose assets, and their reckless and indifferent attention to the data filed via their Schedules and SFA, response to the Questionnaire at the 341, and testimony at the 341. Judge Meyers revoked their discharge after a full day trial. I, personally, do not like to take these actions but am forced to do so to fulfil my duties under 11 USC 704 when presented with facts that cannot be set aside.
The purpose of this e-mail is to reinforce to all bankruptcy debtor attorneys and their staffs the importance of full and complete disclosure of any and all possible assets, as well as preference payments in the Schedules and SFA, and the supporting documentation related to those assets as we request in our Standing Administrative Guidelines. I have long been concerned that many debtors do not fully understand, or take lightly, the importance of such and choose to simply say they “rely on my attorney” or it was just a simple oversight. That is especially glaring where the attorney of record does not appear, but sends special counsel that does not appear to understand the case enough to give advice to the debtor or be able to respond to questions of the trustee and/or creditors. The debtors yesterday offered the defense of “reliance on my attorney,” and “oversight” completely ignoring their own responsibility to actually read and understand what they had disclosed (or failed to disclose) in those documents and to correct any “oversights” promptly. In this particular case, these debtors indicated they had not even seen their attorney but briefly on two occasions with non-attorney staff “doing all the work.”
As you all know, I ask every debtor whether or not they have read and understand the information filed with the Court, as I am sure my fellow Panel members do also. Our Questionnaire further requires the appearing attorney to verify they have gone over the Questions with the debtors and clarified anything the debtors did not understand. Question number 1 asks the debtors if they read and understand the Schedules and SFA and discussed them with their attorney. I go further and ask for confirmation that they have read those documents at least two times to get on record this information in the event I am presented with another of these unpleasant tasks to seek denial of or revocation of discharge., minimizing the “oversight” defense and encouraging each debtor to be thorough, ask questions of his or her attorney, and avoid unpleasant consequences for reckless conduct.
Accordingly, I seek your assistance in avoidance of these issues that result in severe hardship for debtors if their discharge is denied, as well as potential allegations by these debtors against their attorney for obvious complaints.
Thank you for your anticipated help.
So always remember 2 very important things: DISCLOSE and PROVIDE ALL DOCUMENTS your attorney requests of you. Those two simple actions go a long ways towards streamlining to the bankruptcy finish line…….Discharge.
Written by Michael G. Doan– Owner of the Carlsbad Bankruptcy Attorney Office, Michael also manages his business and is a highly skilled Bankruptcy Attorney with over 17 years of experience. Michael is currently concentrating his practice solely in Bankruptcy Law and is a Board Certified Specialist in Consumer Bankruptcy Law by the American Board of Certification, one of only fourteen such attorneys in all of California.
For more information on San Diego Bankruptcy Attorney, feel free to call us today!